Ottawa, CANADA – Nutrition International and the International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie) are proud to unveil the Anaemia Evidence Gap Map (EGM). Developed with support from the Government of Canada, this tool identifies gaps in evidence on the effects of interventions addressing the direct, intermediate, and underlying risk factors for anaemia, particularly in low- and middle-income countries.  

“Nutrition International is committed to improving nutrition for communities around the world. This Evidence Gap Map exemplifies the importance of partnerships in advancing evidence-based actions to achieve global nutrition goals, offering invaluable insights to address anaemia and its multiple causes effectively,” said Mandana Arabi, Vice-President, Research & Development and Chief Technical Advisor, Nutrition International. 

“3ie is delighted to partner with Nutrition International on developing this Evidence Gap Map of the evidence on interventions to address anaemia. By systematically identifying and categorizing existing research, this tool provides decision-makers and practitioners access to the best available evidence,” said Birte Snilstveit, Director—Synthesis and Reviews and Head of London Office, 3ie. “This EGM can be a vital tool and starting point for strategic research for evidence-informed policies and practices to address this global health challenge. This work underscores 3ie’s commitment to bridging evidence gaps and fostering impactful solutions for improved health outcomes in low- and middle-income countries.”

Anaemia remains the most common and widespread nutritional deficiency, affecting millions worldwide. Women, adolescent girls, and young children are disproportionately impacted, with significant consequences for health, development and economic productivity. This innovative tool underscores the importance of evidence-based interventions to combat anaemia effectively. 

This initiative highlights the collaborative efforts of 3ie and Nutrition International in strengthening the evidence base for anaemia interventions. The EGM categorizes studies that assess the effect of nutritional and non-nutritional  interventions that address direct causes of anaemia, such as inadequate intake, absorption, and utilization of micronutrients, chronic diseases, infections, and gynaecological and obstetric conditions, as well of those that address risk factors for anaemia, such as cultural and behavioural norms, poverty, food insecurity, and the lack of access to and/or use of health and nutritional services. By visually mapping existing research and pinpointing gaps, the tool enables researchers, policymakers and program designers to prioritize impactful interventions and allocate resources efficiently. 

Learn more about the EGM and its accompanying briefs 

Watch the full video of the launch webinar below.

Share